Author Archives: Ijaz Ahmad

Muhammad [peace be upon him] in the Bible?

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

muhammad_peacebe-upon-him_

The Qur’aan states:

“Those who will obey this Noble Messenger (Prophet Mohammed – peace and blessings be upon him), the Herald of the Hidden who is untutored (except by Allah), whom they will find mentioned in the Taurat and the Injeel with them; he will command them to do good and forbid them from wrong, and he will make lawful for them the good clean things and prohibit the foul for them, and he will unburden the loads and the neck chains which were upon them; so those who believe in him, and revere him, and help him, and follow the light which came down with him – it is they who have succeeded.” – 7:157.

The Problems with Understanding this Verse:

  1. The Torah and Injeel no longer exist (with us) in their original forms.
  2. The Qur’aan does not specify the group from amongst the Christians and Jews, with whom their version of the Torah and Injeel mention the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).
  3. The Qur’aan does not mention in which form he is described – is it by name, height, race, faith, geography etc?
  4. The claim of the Qur’aan is that he is mentioned and if we can find one Christian, just one, who acknowledges directly that perhaps he is, in some way or the other – then the Qur’aan’s case is true.

The Solutions to Develop Understanding:

  1. Whether or not they are in their original forms, Allaah’s hikmah (wisdom), is such that He has mentioned that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is mentioned in their scriptures and because of this, despite their tampering, canonical controversies and emendations, we will still be able – in some way or the other to find some form of mention about him or the message he was to bring.
  2. Following from the above point, we must confess that perhaps not all renditions of the Bible would convey an accurate mentioning of him, for when we look at the nature and person of Christ in the various writings of the early Christian Churches/ Messianic movements in the Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis – they are quite contradictory and uncertain. Therefore we must assume that some renditions of the Bible would according to their perception of the one to follow the Christ, either demonize him on one extreme or deify him on another extreme. We see that Christians today do claim that Islam is of Satan and justify this by using Biblical verses, thus implicitly although not ideally;, verifying the Qur’aan’s claim.
  3. The final point to note is that because of the various groups and their renditions of the Prophets, whether it be as warriors as is in Judaism or Spirits and Gods as in Christianity, the multitude of ways the Prophet (peace be upon him) could have been mentioned are endless.
  4. I’ve provided this further below, for now however, let’s see one example of his being mentioned.

Is Muhammad (peace be upon him) mentioned in the Gospels?

I’d say he is strongly referred to in the Gospel attributed to John.  Let’s begin with out narrative as is taken from the Gospel itself:

By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive. Up to that time the Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified. – John 7:39.

According to this verse, we know that a Spirit is to come later and this cannot be the Holy Spirit which was already known to all:

Then John gave this testimony: “I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him. – John 1:32.

The verse qualifies this by saying, “Jesus had not yet been glorified“, which is strange, since in many early chapters of John, Jesus was indeed glorified:

We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. – John 1:14.

What Jesus did here in Cana of Galilee was the first of the signs through which he revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him. – John 2:11.

So what does Jesus mean by saying after the Spirit who is to come, arrives, that at this point he’d then be glorified? Jesus gives an answer to this, he says:

“I do not accept glory from human beings” – John 5:41.

So who does Jesus expect this glory from?

How can you believe since you accept glory from one another but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God? – John 5:44.

Jesus replied, “If I glorify myself, my glory means nothing. My Father, whom you claim as your God, is the one who glorifies me. – John 8:54.

How will God glorify the Christ?

“Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. – Matthew 24:30.

Both Muslims and Christians believe that Christ will return as a ruler over the earth, and it is at this point that his glory will be realised, but why at this point? It is because he will rule over the one who is mentioned in John 7:39, he will rule according to the message of the Spirit of John 7:39! Let’s take a quick reminder of what the verse says:

By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive. Up to that time the Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified. – John 7:39.

In order for the Christ to be glorified by God, the Spirit who is to come later, must arrive first and then Christ would be glorified by God in a way which the believers of the Spirit would come to see (Matthew 24:30). The disciples were to believe in a Spirit which was yet to come, or be seen by them:

The Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you. – John 14:17.

The world won’t know him, because they can’t see him, and it is only those whom the are the true believers of God, they will be able to know him. If we recall from the Seerah of Muhammad (peace be upon him), a few select Jews and Christians did recognize him, but the believers who understood Jesus’ true message and allowed it to remain intact, free from all external influences, did recognize the Spirit to come. Moving on, Christ did give another piece of advice on recognizing the Spirit to come:

“When the Advocate comes, whom I will send to you from the Father—the Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father—he will testify about me. – John 15:26.

The only Prophet after Christ to testify about Christ’s position as a Messiah and Prophet of God, is Muhammad (peace be upon him). As John 14:17 rightly claims, most of those who claim to follow Christ will not know him, but those who have internalized Christ’s authentic message – forthwith recognize who the Spirit is, thus fulfilling Christ’s prophecy. Christ continues to describe this Spirit to us:

“But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.” – John 16:13.

The Spirit to come will testify about Christ, but according to this verse, he’d also testify the truth about all things, which if I’m not mistaken – includes Christ. Why would the Spirit to come testify the truth about Christ if it were already known? Certainly Muhammad (peace be upon him) has testified that the Christ was ‘Aissa ibn Maryam (may Allaah be pleased with him), he testified that the Christ was a Prophet and he testified the truth about Maryam (may Allaah be pleased with her). He spoke the truth about Christ and spoke the truth about those who perverted Christ’s message. The verse also says that he will not speak of his own accord:

“And he does not say anything by his own desire. It is but a divine revelation, which is revealed to him. He has been taught by the Extremely Powerful.” – Qur’aan 53:3-5.

Lastly, the the final portion of John 16:13 mentions that, “he will tell you what is yet to come”. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the only Abrahamic Prophet to describe the afterlife in great detail, the Qur’aan itself in the very first chapter addresses God – the only true God, of being the ‘Master of the Day of Judgment’. The Prophet (peace be upon him) went into great detail as to what the judgement would be like, what happens at death and what happens on the Day of Judgement itself and the pleasures/ punishments to follow thereafter.

Is Muhammad (peace be upon him) mentioned in the Old Testament?

Islam literally means, ‘to gain peace in submitting to God’. If I wanted to describe a baby, I would say, ‘the human which has just exited its mother’s womb’. Similarly we find that Islam is expressed in such a way in Job 22:21, for it reads:

“Submit to God and be at peace with him; in this way prosperity will come to you.” – Job 22:21.

This verse in no uncertain terms has mentioned that we should follow Islam. Let’s see what one Bible commentary states about this verse:

Blue Letter Bible - Lexicon

We find the above to be quite revealing, for even Biblical commentators accept that Islam is the faith which is to be followed. You can see it yourself here in Gesenius’s Lexicon. I think the best part of this quote is where it says, ‘hence true religion, meaning Mahometanism‘. From this, even Christians scholars accept that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is mentioned in some way in the Bible, thus qualifying the Qur’aan’s claim from 7:157.

Lastly, we read:

 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. – Deuteronomy 18:18.

The word for brethren is אֲחֵיהֶ֖ם, which meansbrother, cousin, relative, kinsman, reciprocal relationship‘, with certainty we know that the Arabs are the kinsman, the brothers to, the cousins of, the relatives with and the relatives of the Israelites through Ishamael (may God be pleased with him).

Conclusion

The evidence is quite overwhelming, despite the hoops through which Missionaries may jump, they cannot hide the truth of Muhammad (peace be upon him) before foretold of by Christ and in their Prophets.

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

Jesus Was Not a Trinitarian – Dr. Anthony Buzzard [Free on Amazon]

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

Dr. Anthony Buzzard is one of the foremost Biblical Scholars on the Trinitarian dogma. Last year he published a book called, “Jesus was not a Trinitarian”. A Brother notified me that it was available for free download via Amazon.com. My advice would be to get this book while it’s available for free. You can read it via the Free Amazon Kindle App for PC.

cc-2013-buzzardbook

Click here to go to the Amazon link.

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

Can God have a Son? Can Christ have a Son?

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

Here are some pretty interesting answers to these questions by some Christians.

cc-2013-godson

 

 

I’d like to invite some comments about these answers or some new answers on this question by our Christian brothers and sisters. Lastly, I’d like to thank our Facebook page manager, Sr. Nasrin for procuring this screenshot – yes, we have women who work with us, Alhamdulillah.

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

An Argument to End Them All

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

In other words, ‘how to stop a missionary dead in his tracks’ – (disclaimer it’s a pun, a metaphor, i.e. not literal – we have some crazies on here who love taking things out of context). During a discussion I was having with fellow team member, Sr. Alice, we inadvertently, came up with an argument that I think would shut any missionary up quite quickly.

Missionary: You should accept that Christ died for your sins.

Muslim: I don’t believe the Holy Spirit is God. Is it a blasphemy to say that the Holy Spirit is not God?

Missionary: Yes!

Muslim: Well according to this verse, “but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin”. – Mark 3:29.

(Note, you don’t have to repeat what Gill’s exposition is, but you should understand what the verse means, to aid with this, we’ve provided what his exposition says below.)

Gill’s Exposition of the entire bible explains Mark 3:39 as:

“But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, Against his person, and the works performed by him, by ascribing them to diabolical power and influence, as the Scribes did, hath never forgiveness: there is no pardon provided in the covenant of grace, nor obtained by the blood of Christ for such persons, or ever applied to them by the Spirit; but is in danger of eternal damnation”

Muslim: Isn’t it true that not even the blood of Christ will wash away the sin of blaspheming the Holy Spirit?

Missionary: ……………………….

Muslim: Doesn’t that mean, whether I accept Christ or not, I’m still going to hell?

In conclusion, as Sr. Alice has said:

Why should we accept Christ as our Lord and Saviour if we as Muslims have already blasphemed against the Holy Spirit? This is a sin that even the blood of Jesus can not wash.

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

Pamela Geller + Robert Spencer Banned from UK

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

Exciting news from London today, when it was announced that the two Islamophobic speakers were prohibited from entering the UK, thus barring their appearance at a provocative EDL sanctioned rally at the site of the Woolwich incident. According to a government spokesperson, their presence in the UK was, “not conducive to the public good“.  The BBC (UK) News had this to report:

“Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, who had called for the bloggers to be banned from the UK, said: “I welcome the home secretary’s ban on Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer from entering the country. This is the right decision. The UK should never become a stage for inflammatory speakers who promote hate.”

“Anti-fascism campaigners Hope Not Hate had campaigned for the pair to not be allowed into the UK. A researcher with the organisation, Matthew Collins, sa;id it was “delighted” with the decision. “These two are among some of the most extreme anti-Muslim activists in the world. They’ve nothing to contribute to life in this country. “They’re not here to contribute to good community relations. They only wanted to come here and help the EDL stir up more trouble. Britain doesn’t need more hate even just for a few days.”

The exclusion decision from the Home Office cited remarks by both Geller and Spencer which demonstrated their views which may, “foster hatred” and possibly cause “inter-community violence” in the UK.

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

Quick Tip for Talking with Missionaries

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

Despite having been in this arena for a few years, I’m always finding new ways to interact with anti-Islamic polemicists. While attending a conference yesterday, I came across some invaluable advice in a book I’ve enjoyed reading for sometime (“How to Read a Book”, by Mortimer J. Adler). Many Ulama have recommended this book and I’m quite happy they did, it’s been very informative and extremely enlightening, it’s worth significantly more than you’d ever pay for it.

When we dialogue with missionaries, or conservative groups (EDL, BNP etc), sometimes even atheists, we find them claiming things of Islam that we don’t necessarily believe. Case in point, “Muslims worship a moon God“. As a Muslim, I’ve never been told to worship the moon, nor has Allaah ever been described as the moon, nor was the moon taught to me as being a deity. In fact, the Qur’aan directly speaks against anyone worshipping the sun or the moon:

“And the night, and the day, and the sun, and the moon are among His signs; do not prostrate for the sun or the moon, but prostrate for Allah Who has created them, if you are His bondmen.” – Qur’aan 41:37.

So, what should we do when we’re faced with someone who is claiming that Muslims believe X, when in reality we believe in….not X (let X be any arbitrary argument about Islamic belief – moon God, Injil is Bible etc)? It’s simple, you as the Muslim must declare: This is now what Islam teaches and as a Muslim, this is not what I believe. From this, we can take Mortimer’s advice, he says:

You yourself may remember an occasion where someone said to a speaker, in one breath or at most two, “I don’t know what you mean, but I think you’re wrong.” There is actually no point in answering critics of this sort. The only polite thing to do is to ask them to state your position for you, the position they claim to be challenging. If they cannot do it satisfactorily, if they cannot repeat what you have said in their own words, you know that they do not understand, and you are entirely justified in ignoring their criticisms. They are irrelevant, as all criticism must be that is not based on understanding. – How to Read a Book, Mortimer J. Adler, Page 97.

In sum:

  1. Opponent makes claim.
  2. If this is not what we as Muslims believe, declare this to your opponent, clarify what we actually do believe.
  3. He will say you’re wrong (he will deny your declaration).
  4. Ask him to explain to you what you said you believed.
  5. If he can’t or refuses to, then his criticism is unfounded, as what he is attacking, has no basis in our deen.

It’s simple, but pure genius. How can you expect to carry on an intelligent and worthwhile discussion with someone who claims to understand your beliefs, but cannot accurately express them to you? Such a person is pretending to have knowledge that they do not have and you should inform them of their lack of knowledge and decorum.

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

 

Chat with a JW

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

A Jehovah’s Witness, well two actually were at my door a few minutes ago. An older gentleman named David and a younger female – who looked eerily familiar, but at the time I couldn’t put my finger on who she was. Our discussion was brief, perhaps less than 20 minutes and the gentleman was very cordial throughout, the girl with him (young woman I should say) was very quiet and listened attentively.

We spoke about the Biblical canon and its transformation into scripture, I mostly spoke as he asked questions – not in response to me, but because he didn’t know these things or had ‘forgotten’ them. Every scripture I spoke about, I made mention to cite them, every point I made, I ensured it was based on some Biblical principle. Both the JW’s and myself seemed to enjoy the conversation.

It was about 10 minutes into the conversation that the girl with the man, was my neighbour! I hadn’t seen her in a while, so this was an interesting turn of events. The conversation continued, he attempted to talk to me about the name of God, but I pulled out the ‘we lost the name of God argument’ from 2 Cor. 12 and that seemed to be the final blow. He took my name and number and as a result we’ve got a date @ 5PM on Wednesday!

I’m looking forward to it….

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

Umar Lee Apostates from Christianity

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

Umar Lee caused quite a stir when he became Christian not too long ago. His video was posted by David Wood and Robert Spencer, even Pamela Geller! Today he’s posted a new video – he’s apostated from Christianity and is now Muslim! Here’s the video, but most of us are still left wondering if David, Spencer or Pamela will post his new video too, or will they even comment on it?

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

Bible Burning Egyptian Preacher Sentenced to 11 Years in Prison

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,

Ahmed Abdullah, or ‘Abu Islam’ who burned Bibles during the ‘Innocence of Muslims’ protests, has been sentenced to 11 years in prison and his son, has been sentenced to 8 years in prison on charges of insulting religion and burning the Bible. Ahram (Arab) News reports:

An Egyptian misdemeanors court has issued an 11 year prison sentence to Islamist preacher Ahmed Abdullah (AKA Abu Islam) on charges of insulting religion and burning the Bible. Abu Islam, who is the head of two Islamic satellite TV channels – the Umma and Mariya – has also been fined LE3000, but the verdict will be suspended pending appeal.

The court also sentenced Islam, Abu-Islam’s son, to eight years in prison and fined him LE 2000 for taking part in burning the Bible with his father. This sentence is also suspended pending appeal. During an 11 September 2012 demonstration in front the US embassy in Cairo protesting the anti-Islam film “Innocence of Muslims,” the Muslim cleric publicly burned copies of the Bible. Before leaving the demonstration, he told the crowd that he would later send his grandson to urinate on the Bible.

Last week, Amnesty International expressed concern over the increasing number of charges for blasphemy and insulting religion in Egypt. Amnesty stated that the majority of those targeted by such accusations in Egypt are Coptic Christians. In February 2013, the prosecutor general ordered Abu Islam’s arrest for allegedly insulting Christianity.

Wonder how Pamella Geller, Robert Spencer or David Wood would describe an ‘Islamist Egypt’ protecting Christianity? For those who don’t know, this guy also justified sexually assaulting female protesters, see this article by Sh. Musa Furber.

wa Allaahu ‘Alam.

« Older Entries Recent Entries »